ArticleActa orthopaedica2026
Increased all-cause mortality following distal radius fractures in Danish adults: a register-based matched cohort study.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeDistal radius fractures (DRFs) are common in older adults and are associated with osteoporosis and underlying frailty. While hip and spine fractures are associated with increased mortality, the association between DRFs and all-cause mortality remains less clear. We aimed to assess all-cause mortality risk following DRF in Denmark compared with age- and sex-matched controls.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide, register-based matched cohort study using data from the Danish National Patient Register and Civil Registration System (1998-2018). Adults (≥ 18 years) with a DRF were matched 1:5 to controls by sex and birthdate ± 30 days. Mortality rates per 103 persons and mortality rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated at 30, 90, 365, and 730 days after the fracture.
resultsWe included 190,513 patients with DRF and 952,565 controls (70% female, mean age 59 years). Mortality rates were higher for patients with DRF compared with controls across all age categories, particularly in men and within the first 30 days. Among men, mortality rates ranged from 0.36 to 52.9 per 1,000 persons in patients with DRF and from 0.07 to 20.0 per 1,000 persons in controls. Among women, mortality ranged from 0.16 to 26.3 per 1,000 persons in patients with DRF and from 0.04 to 15.9 per 1,000 persons in controls. Mortality rate ratios were highest for the 50-59 age category (male: 4.60, CI 3.95-5.35, female 3.08, CI 2.80-3.39), decreasing with higher age. Mortality rate ratios stabilized after 365 and 730 days.
conclusionThis nationwide study shows increased all-cause mortality among patients with DRF compared with sex and age-matched controls, with the highest mortality rate within the first 30 days after the fracture. The mortality rate ratio was consistently higher in the age-group 50-59 and among males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.