Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42105248›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Estimation of genetic parameters for heifer pregnancy and carcass traits in angus cattle.

Sarah L Phelps, Miranda M Culbertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah L PhelpsDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Miranda M CulbertsonDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic relationship between heifer pregnancy (HP) and carcass traits in purebred Angus cattle was evaluated in this study to expand industry knowledge of the impact of carcass trait selection on HP and the potential use of carcass traits as indicators of HP. Historical data consisting of 1,462 records for HP and 4,519 records for carcass traits from the Iowa State University McNay Memorial Research and Demonstration Farm were used in this study. A pedigree consisting of 10,455 individuals with parent generations ranging from 1 to 9 for sires and 1 to 11 for dams was used to build relationships among individuals. Genetic correlations between HP and carcass traits were analyzed using multivariate models consisting of HP, weaning weight (WWT), and a single carcass trait. Results from this study estimated a low heritability of 0.09 ± 0.06 for HP and estimates of 0.36 ± 0.04 for ribeye area (REA), 0.39 ± 0.04 for backfat thickness (FAT), 0.48 ± 0.04 for marbling score (MS), 0.38 ± 0.04 for hot carcass weight (HCW), 0.18 ± 0.03 for weaning weight direct (WWTd), and 0.07 ± 0.02 for weaning weight maternal (WWTm). Genetic correlations between HP and both carcass and weaning traits were negative with estimates of -0.32 ± 0.23 for REA, -0.22 ± 0.23 for FAT, -0.10 ± 0.22 for MS, -0.44 ± 0.21 for HCW, and -0.20 ± 0.25 for WWTd. All estimates of genetic correlation were accompanied by large standard errors. The results from this study suggest a potential antagonistic genetic relationship between heifer pregnancy and carcass trait performance in this herd of Angus cattle.

Indexed as

Body CompositionPregnancy, AnimalAnimalsBody WeightCattleFemalePregnancybeef cattlecarcass traitsheifer pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42105248
PMCPMC13211979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.