ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Genetic associations between pregnancy loss and economically important traits in Nellore cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Weighted Single-Step GWAS Reveals Genetic Mechanisms Underlying Pregnancy Loss in Early Nellore Heifers.Animal genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy losses (PL) affect calf production and economic efficiency in beef cattle operations. Here, PL was defined as failure from pregnancy diagnosis to calving, capturing a window approximately 60 d after the breeding season. In Zebu breeds, the genetic understanding of this phenomenon remains limited. The objective of this study was to estimate genetic parameters for PL in Nellore heifers and its associations with reproductive, growth, feed efficiency, and carcass traits. The dataset comprised 23,507 Nellore heifers with pregnancy diagnosis records (17,052 genotyped) from the Animal Genetics and Breeding Program (GMA), developed by the Animal Breeding and Biotechnology Group (GMAB) at the University of São Paulo, Brazil. Variance components and genetic parameters were estimated using a two-trait threshold-threshold animal model for PL jointly with the probability of early calving at 30 mo of age (PP30) and stayability (STAY), and a two-trait threshold-linear animal model for PL with age at first calving (AFC), scrotal circumference adjusted to 365 d (SC365), cumulative cow productivity (CCP), body weight adjusted to 240 (W240) and 455 d of age (W455), rib eye area (REA), rump fat thickness (RFT), marbling (MAR), residual feed intake (RFI), and dry matter intake (DMI). For all traits, the single-step GBLUP methodology was applied. The two-trait analyses were carried out using Bayesian inference through the Gibbs sampling algorithm implemented in the GIBBSF90+ software. The estimated heritability (h2) for PL was low (0.033), indicating strong environmental influence. Genetic correlations between PL and reproductive traits (PP30, STAY, AFC, CCP, and SC365) ranged from -0.15 to 0.93. For growth (W240 and W455) and carcass (REA, RFT, and MAR), genetic correlation ranged from -0.16 to 0.01. For RFI and DMI, genetic correlations were -0.44 and 0.07, respectively. The direct genetic gain for PL was of low magnitude. The relative efficiency of selection indicates that direct selection for PL tends to be less efficient than indirect selection. Therefore, the results of this study demonstrate that, although PL shows low h2, it is favorably correlated with sexual precocity in females. Selection for growth and carcass traits is not expected to affect PL, whereas the observed antagonistic correlation with RFI suggests a potential increase in PL among more feed-efficient animals, although this effect is small and not conclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.