ArticleScience and engineering ethics2026
Engineering Ethics, Risk, and Islamic Values in Contemporary Technologies.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Debates in science and engineering ethics increasingly focus on how professionals should act under conditions of uncertainty, especially when essential technologies may pose low-probability but non-negligible risks to human health or the environment. A normative framework for engineering decision-making is developed, grounded in Islamic ethical concepts, and applied to four contemporary technological domains: electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure from high-voltage power infrastructure, radiofrequency (RF) exposure from mobile phones, water use in hydrogen fuel production, and hazardous waste from end-of-life solar photovoltaic (PV) panels. Drawing on the Qur'an and Hadith literature, as well as contemporary discussions of the higher objectives of Islamic law and professional engineering codes, the moral significance of public interest, harm prevention, stewardship, justice, and trusteeship is elaborated. The analysis shows how these values support precautionary yet innovation-friendly responses to uncertain risk, emphasizing transparency, distributional fairness, long-term environmental responsibility, and accountability to affected communities. By articulating points of convergence and complementarity between Islamic ethics and mainstream engineering ethics, a faith-informed framework is contributed that can guide engineers working in Muslim-majority contexts and in culturally diverse societies toward more responsible design, regulation, and deployment of emerging technologies. Read through the lens of the five ethical principles articulated in this framework-harm prevention, public interest, stewardship, justice, and trusteeship-the hadith metaphor emphasizes that ethical engineering consists of small but responsible actions taken with awareness of risk, care for others, and accountability to both present and future generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.