ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Molecularly diverse lonazolac-inspired pyrazole-cyanopyridin-2-one conjugates: design, synthesis, in vitro, in vivo and in silico studies as multi-target anti-inflammatory agents.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New pyrazole/3-cyanopyridin-2-one conjugates 4a-f and 5a-h were designed and synthesized; their anti-inflammatory activities were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. In the LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cell line, nitric oxide (NO) inhibitory activity revealed that 4b, 4e, and 5c were the most powerful NO inhibitors, with % inhibition of 64.97, 71.45 and 73.61, respectively, compared with indomethacin (60.97). Hybrids 4f (IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
42105143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.