ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Integrating ConvNeXt tiny and radiomics in a nomogram to differentiate true progression from pseudoprogression in glioma.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDifferentiating true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP) in glioma is challenging due to overlapping enhancement patterns on conventional MRI. Therefore, a reliable noninvasive approach integrating imaging heterogeneity is needed to improve TP/PsP discrimination.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 293 patients with true progression (TP, n = 208) or pseudoprogression (PsP, n = 85). Baseline multiparametric MRI was analyzed. Traditional radiomics and deep learning features extracted using a pre-trained ConvNeXt Tiny network were selected through reproducibility, redundancy, and LASSO analyses to construct imaging signatures, which were combined with clinical factors to develop a deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN). Model performance was evaluated using ROC analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis, and compared with radiologists' assessments.
resultsThe DLRN demonstrated excellent predictive efficacy, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.908 in the test set. Its performance significantly surpassed that of any individual signature (DeLong test, P < 0.001) and the independent assessments of two senior radiologists. The model exhibited good calibration, and decision curve analysis confirmed its superior clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. When used as a decision-support tool, the nomogram significantly and consistently improved both radiologists' diagnostic performance, yielding a net reclassification improvement greater than 1.1 in both the training and test sets (all P < 0.01).
conclusionThe deep learning imaging biomarker nomogram demonstrated excellent performance in differentiating TP from PsP in gliomas, outperforming traditional methods and radiologists, and effectively assisting clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42105112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.