ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Imaging review of aortic fistulas.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic fistulas represent rare but life-threatening communications between the aorta and the adjacent structures, most commonly the gastrointestinal tract. They are classified as primary, arising spontaneously in the setting of a native, diseased aorta, or secondary to prior aortic surgery or endovascular repair. Clinical presentation is often variable and nonspecific-ranging from gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis, abdominal pain to hemodynamic collapse-making imaging pivotal for diagnosis. Computed tomography angiography is the preferred imaging modality. Imaging features such as visualization of the fistula tract and active contrast extravasation into the fistulized hollow organ are definitive signs of aortic fistulas, but are rarely encountered. On the contrary, nonspecific indirect imaging features such as loss of fat planes and/or ectopic foci of gas are more frequently seen. Prompt recognition of these indirect imaging features is crucial, as delayed diagnosis significantly increases mortality. This review article summarizes the types, clinical features, and imaging findings of aortic fistulas, emphasizing the radiologist's pivotal role in timely detection and management of aortic fistulas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42105096What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.