ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2026
Concatenation, Conflict, and Complexity: Genealogical Heterogeneity Mimics Substitutional Heterogeneity for Nucleotide Model Selection.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When Complex Models Fit the Wrong Mechanistic Complexity in Phylogenomic Analysis.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phylogenetic conflict-particularly hidden gene-tree discordance generated by incomplete lineage sorting (ILS)-is pervasive in multilocus and phylogenomic datasets, yet its consequences for nucleotide substitution model selection remain poorly understood. Modern molecular studies increasingly collect and concatenate large sets of independent loci sampled across distant and often poorly characterized regions of the genome, creating significant potential for heterogeneity when analyzed in combination. Here, we examine whether intra-alignment genealogical conflict can influence standard model selection procedures to favor parameter-rich substitution models even when sequences evolve under a simple substitution process. Through a series of in silico case studies, we simulated sequence evolution under the simplest rate-homogeneous Jukes-Cantor (JC69) model and generated concatenated alignments as mosaics of multiple loci, each evolving on its own gene tree drawn under the multispecies coalescent. Conflict was increased by manipulating conditions expected to elevate ILS and gene-tree heterogeneity and embedding progressively more hidden genealogies within alignments while holding total alignment length constant. Despite all data being generated under JC69, model selection frequently favored more complex models, with varying sensitivity depending on the number of taxa, the expected amount of conflict, and the specific selection criterion applied. A dominant pattern was frequent inclusion of among-site rate variation parameters (+ G4 and/or + I), and under extreme conflict, model selection increasingly favored richer substitution models (e.g., SYM, GTR). Broadly, our results showed that hidden conflict can manifest as substitutional and rate heterogeneity, driving selection procedures to compensate with additional parameters in concatenated analyses under high conflict. Broadly, our study contributes to a greater understanding and appreciation of the challenges in modeling molecular evolution in the era of multilocus phylogenetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.