ArticleArchives of women's mental health2026
Who is screened for perinatal mental health? findings from an academic health system in California.
Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify sociodemographic characteristics, prenatal healthcare utilization, and health factors associated with completed mental health screenings during pregnancy and postpartum, respectively.
methodsWe examined electronic medical records (EMR) data on documented perinatal mental health screenings from over 6000 patients who delivered singleton infants within one academic healthcare system in California between 2021 and 2023. Dependent variables included having at least one Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score documented in the EMR during (1) pregnancy and (2) postpartum, among those who completed postpartum care within 12 weeks of delivery. We used univariate frequencies to determine rates of completed screenings and logistic regression models to identify patient characteristics associated with completed screenings in each time period.
resultsOverall, 67% of patients completed screenings in pregnancy and 56% completed screenings in postpartum. In pregnancy, patients who were White, multiparous, did not prefer English, began prenatal care in the third trimester, and completed 10 or fewer prenatal care visits each had lower odds of completed screenings than their counterparts. In postpartum, patients who were White, privately insured, had vaginal deliveries, and had term births (at least 37 weeks of gestation) each had lower odds of completed screenings than their counterparts.
conclusionsAlthough California law requires perinatal mental health screening in pregnancy and postpartum , the identified inequities in screening suggest additional efforts are needed to ensure all perinatal patients are screened for mental health in accordance with the law. These efforts should be tailored to the populations least likely to be screened in order to achieve universal perinatal mental health screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.