ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
Multiple vertebrae improves precision in image-based bone marrow absorbed dose estimation in [
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe bone marrow is a critical dose limiting organ in patients receiving radionuclide therapy, but image-based bone marrow dosimetry is not routinely performed in clinical practice. High noise levels and the limited number of vertebral cavities used in bone marrow absorbed dose calculations make absorbed dose estimates susceptible to large uncertainties. This study explores the effects of the number of included vertebrae, partial volume effects, and reconstruction parameters on image-based bone marrow absorbed dose calculations. We included sixteen patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors treated with [
resultsIncreasing the number of vertebrae from one to six improved precision in absorbed doses, reducing the coefficient of variation (COV) from 34 to 6.2%. Only minor differences (0.1%) in bone marrow absorbed dose were observed when adjusting reconstruction parameters from 1 subset, 60 iterations, to 12 subsets, 5 iterations. In the Lung-Spine phantom, smaller volumes (4 mL) were more sensitive to noise than larger volumes (16 mL), with COVs of 36% and 17%, respectively, at 60 updates. In the XCAT phantom, a decrease in recovery was observed in vertebrae near high-uptake regions (L5: 0.63, L1: 0.29), at 60 updates at the highest noise level.
conclusionIncluding multiple lesion-free vertebrae enhances precision in image-based bone marrow absorbed dose calculations. Nevertheless, careful selection of vertebrae is important, as closely located high-uptake areas can bias absorbed dose estimates. Applying partial volume correction could mitigate spill-out effects, further improving accuracy. Additionally, the minimal differences between reconstruction parameters suggest that bone marrow absorbed dose estimates remain stable across subset configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.