ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2026
Machine Learning-driven Prediction of Cervical Cancer Cell Viability After Treatment With Thymoquinone, Curcumin, and 5-Fluorouracil.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains prevalent among women globally, driven by uncontrolled cell proliferation and evasion of apoptosis. Phytochemicals like Thymoquinone (TQ) and Curcumin (CUR) are gaining attention for their safety, affordability, and biological activities. This study evaluated the cytotoxic, anti-proliferative, and apoptotic effects of TQ and CUR compared with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and developed machine-learning models to predict cell viability from dose-response data. HeLa cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of TQ, CUR and 5-FU. Cell viability, morphology, and apoptosis were assessed using MTT and AO/EtBr staining. Machine-learning models: Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Random Trees (RT), and Boosted Trees (BT) were trained using experimental variables. Sensitivity analysis determined key predictors of model accuracy. Low concentrations of TQ and CUR showed minimal cytotoxicity, while higher doses reduced cell viability compared to controls. AO/EtBr staining confirmed dose-dependent apoptosis: 5-FU caused extensive late apoptosis, TQ induced both early and late apoptotic features, and CUR triggered early apoptosis. ANN demonstrated highest predictive accuracy, followed by BT and GPR. Sensitivity analysis identified IC₅₀ as the most influential parameter, with dose contributing significantly, while molecular weight had minimal impact. TQ and CUR show promising anticancer activity in cervical cancer cells. Integrating experimental assays with machine-learning models, particularly ANN, provides a framework for predicting phytochemical-based therapeutic responses and supports AI's potential in cervical cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42105068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.