Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42105066›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2026

Sex Differences in LVAD Therapy: From Diagnosis to Destination.

Jarrett Fowler, Mahwash Kassi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jarrett FowlerDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mahwash KassiDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA. mkassi@houstonmethodist.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSex disparities in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy remain a significant challenge in advanced heart failure care. This review synthesizes evidence on differences in epidemiology, clinical presentation, anatomical suitability, complications, and long-term recovery to clarify why women remain underrepresented despite comparable survival with contemporary devices. RECENT

findingsWomen constitute nearly half of the heart failure population but only 20-25% of LVAD implantations. They often present later with HF phenotypes marked by microvascular dysfunction, diastolic stiffness, smaller ventricular size, and reduced right-sided reserve, increasing perceived procedural risk. Although contemporary centrifugal-flow devices have eliminated sex-based survival differences, women experience higher rates of hemorrhagic stroke, pump thrombosis, rehospitalization, and psychosocial burden. Contributing factors include device-patient mismatch, differences in clinical presentation, and disparities in referral and timing of evaluation for advanced heart failure therapies. Emerging innovations, such as miniaturized pumps, sex-specific risk models, and improved hemodynamic assessment, aim to reduce these disparities. Achieving equity will require adaptable device designs, sex-specific diagnostic thresholds, individualized perioperative management, and greater female representation in clinical research.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsAdvanced Heart FailureDevice-Patient MismatchLeft Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)Sex Differences

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.