ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2026
Sex Differences in LVAD Therapy: From Diagnosis to Destination.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSex disparities in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy remain a significant challenge in advanced heart failure care. This review synthesizes evidence on differences in epidemiology, clinical presentation, anatomical suitability, complications, and long-term recovery to clarify why women remain underrepresented despite comparable survival with contemporary devices. RECENT
findingsWomen constitute nearly half of the heart failure population but only 20-25% of LVAD implantations. They often present later with HF phenotypes marked by microvascular dysfunction, diastolic stiffness, smaller ventricular size, and reduced right-sided reserve, increasing perceived procedural risk. Although contemporary centrifugal-flow devices have eliminated sex-based survival differences, women experience higher rates of hemorrhagic stroke, pump thrombosis, rehospitalization, and psychosocial burden. Contributing factors include device-patient mismatch, differences in clinical presentation, and disparities in referral and timing of evaluation for advanced heart failure therapies. Emerging innovations, such as miniaturized pumps, sex-specific risk models, and improved hemodynamic assessment, aim to reduce these disparities. Achieving equity will require adaptable device designs, sex-specific diagnostic thresholds, individualized perioperative management, and greater female representation in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42105066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.