ReviewDermatology and therapy2026
Therapies for Infantile Haemangiomas: Current Practice and Evolving Perspectives.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infantile haemangiomas (IH) are the most common vascular tumours of infancy, characterised by a predictable trajectory of rapid proliferation, plateau, and slow spontaneous involution. Although most regress uneventfully, a significant minority risk ulceration, functional compromise, or disfigurement, and therefore require timely intervention. The therapeutic landscape was once dominated by corticosteroids, interferon, and cytotoxic chemotherapeutics of modest efficacy and considerable toxicity. Management was revolutionized in 2008 by the discovery that the beta-blocker propranolol induced prompt and sustained regression. Propranolol has since become the established first-line therapy for IH, with efficacy and safety confirmed by randomized controlled trials and corroborated by observational cohorts. Mechanistically there are multiple temporally stratified actions: immediate vasoconstriction, suppression of angiogenic signalling pathways, induction of endothelial apoptosis, and ultimately the promotion of adipogenic differentiation in keeping with natural involution. Safety is favourable under expert supervision, though hypoglycemia remains the principal preventable hazard, necessitating caregiver education on feeding regimens and "sick day" rules. Rebound growth, encountered in roughly one-fifth of cases, usually responds to re-treatment. Alternative beta-blockers such as atenolol and nadolol provide comparable efficacy with potential advantages in tolerability or dosing convenience. Topical timolol has limited effectiveness for small superficial lesions, while sirolimus, becaplermin gel, laser devices, and surgery may have circumscribed adjunctive roles. Corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents are now confined to salvage use. Contemporary perspectives extend beyond pharmacology to encompass caregiver experience and health-system burden. Recent work highlights the low burden of treatment with propranolol, while digital innovations such as photo-triage during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrate opportunities to reduce healthcare exposure and improve equity of access. This review describes the evolution of drug therapy for IH and integrates mechanistic insights, clinical pragmatism, and patient-centred innovations to chart the current trajectory of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.