ReviewPain and therapy2026
Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block: A Scoping Review of Anatomical Rationale, Techniques, and Clinical Applications.
Review in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe anterior quadratus lumborum block (aQLB) is a fascial plane block targeting the interfascial plane between the quadratus lumborum and psoas major muscles, aiming to achieve both somatic and visceral analgesia through potential spread of local anesthetic toward the thoracolumbar nerve roots. Despite years of clinical use and a growing body of randomized trials across different surgical settings, uncertainty remains regarding its mechanisms of action, patterns of local anesthetic spread, and overall clinical effectiveness. This scoping review aimed to systematically map and synthesize the available evidence on aQLB and identify key knowledge gaps relevant to clinical practice and future research.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception to February 14, 2026. The search terms included variations of aQLB and related terminology. Only randomized controlled trials were included in this review.
resultsA total of 1174 records were identified, of which 360 underwent full-text assessment, and 119 randomized controlled trials were included. Most studies were conducted in Asia (63%) and involved adults (92%). Abdominal and urological procedures were the most commonly studied surgical indications (56%), followed by orthopedic surgeries (26%) and obstetric-gynecological procedures (17%). Multiple aQLB variants have been reported, including transmuscular, subcostal anterior, supra-arcuate ligament, and lateral arcuate ligament approaches. Comparators included sham or no block, wound infiltration, transversus abdominis plane block, erector spinae plane block, paravertebral block, neuraxial techniques, and other regional techniques. Across studies, the aQLB generally reduced postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, the findings were heterogeneous and varied by surgical procedure and study design.
conclusionsThe available literature suggests that aQLB may provide effective postoperative analgesia and opioid-sparing benefits across different surgical procedures. However, inconsistent findings among studies, the limited number of well-designed randomized controlled trials, and substantial heterogeneity across surgical populations restrict the strength of the current conclusions. Moreover, the deep anatomical location of the block, technical complexity, and potential risks should be considered when evaluating its role in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.