ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Use of expandable lateral lumbar interbody devices to restore disc height and segmental lordosis: a cadaveric study.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a well-established and efficient technique for treating various thoracolumbar spine pathologies. However, in some scenarios, the amount of segmental lordosis achieved is insufficient. Two main strategies have been used to address this: disruption of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) via anterior column realignment and, more recently, the use of expandable interbody cages that allow intraoperative adjustment of segmental lordosis without requiring ALL release.
methodsTwelve expandable lateral interbody devices were placed in seven fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens in the prone position. Segmental lordosis (degrees), anterior disc height, and posterior disc height (both in arbitrary units normalized to the L4 vertebral body height) were assessed before and after cage expansion. Because of the small number of clusters, generalized estimating equations (GEE) with Mancl-DeRouen small-sample correction were used as the primary analysis; disc height ratios were modeled on the log scale and the lordosis angle on a Gaussian scale.
resultsSeven specimens were included in the study. Two patients underwent three-level instrumentation, one underwent two-level instrumentation, and four underwent one-level instrumentation, totaling 12 instrumented levels. The mean segmental lordosis increased from 4.5° (± 4.3°) pre-expansion to 11.8° (± 4.2°) post-expansion. Small-sample-corrected GEE models confirmed significant postoperative improvements across all three outcomes: segmental lordosis increased by a mean of 7.25° (post-pre; 95% CI, 1.6-12.9; p = 0.020), posterior disc height by 61% (post/pre ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.30-1.92; p < 0.0001), and anterior disc height by 122% (post/pre ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.31-3.12; p = 0.001). Complete ALL rupture occurred in two of the 12 levels (17%).
conclusionWithin the limitations of a small cadaveric feasibility study, the placement of an expandable lateral interbody device in the prone position was associated with immediate increases in segmental lordosis and both anterior and posterior disc heights. These findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating in nature. Because the study design cannot separate the effect of cage expansion from that of prone positioning and because no static cage control was included, adequately powered prospective clinical studies are required before any claim of superiority can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42105021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.