ArticleThe oncologist2026
Selective internal radiotherapy and chemosaturation show equivalent survival in metastatic uveal melanoma: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic uveal melanoma (UM) primarily affects the liver, and due to low response rates to systemic therapies, liver-directed therapies (LDT) are commonly used for hepatic tumor control. Direct head-to-head trials comparing these LDTs are still lacking.
methodsA retrospective multicenter explorative analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT), and percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP, chemosaturation).
resultsThe present analysis was conducted on a cohort of 121 patients who had been treated for metastatic UM with LDT at five different skin cancer centers. A total of n = 15 patients received TACE (12.4%), n = 51 SIRT (42.1%), and n = 55 PHP (45.5%). The estimated median overall survival (OS) for SIRT was 25.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3-34.8), for TACE, 11.4 months (95% CI, 7.8-14.9), and for PHP, 24.9 months (95% CI, 13.7-36.0). In the multivariate analysis that included LDH and additional systemic therapies, there was no significant difference in OS between SIRT and PHP (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.67-1.93, P = .63), whereas TACE was found to be associated with a substantially reduced in OS compared to PHP (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.31-8.04, P = .01). Adverse events occurred in 41.6% of patients undergoing SIRT, 64.3% of patients receiving TACE, and 84.6% of patients receiving PHP.
conclusionThe findings of this study indicate that SIRT and PHP demonstrate equivalent survival rates in a real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.