Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104878›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2026

Long-Duration Response to Levodopa in the PPMI-Cohort.

Nils Schnalke, Tim Feige, Tom Hähnel, Björn Falkenburger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Dark Matter of Levodopa Pharmacodynamics.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nils SchnalkeDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0870-8105
Tim FeigeCenter for Neurodegenerative Diseases within the Helmholtz Association (DZNE), Dresden, Germany.
Tom HähnelDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-2399
Björn FalkenburgerDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with levodopa results in a sustained reduction of symptoms. Although the plasma half-life of levodopa is short, it elicits a lasting effect, the long-duration levodopa response (LDR). A decrease in LDR as PD progresses has been linked to motor complications, but long-term data on the LDR and its clinical implications remain scarce.

objectivesThe aim is to analyze the magnitude and impact of the LDR over time using data from the Parkinson's Disease Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI).

methodsFirst, therapy-naïve Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) scores were predicted using a mixed linear model (MLM) from n = 245 untreated people with PD (PwPD). This model yielded an increase of MDS-UPDRS III scores of 2.65 points per year. Using this model, we then calculated LDR and short-duration response in longitudinal data of 148 initially therapy-naïve PwPD. Symptom progression was analyzed using correlation analyses and MLMs.

resultsIn the 98 PwPD with observed LDR, the LDR accounted for approximately half of the total levodopa response. No significant change in LDR magnitude was observed over up to 10 years (analysis of variance, P = 0.14; generalized estimating equations, P = 0.26). The LDR magnitude was not associated with the onset of motor complications. PwPD with absent LDR (n = 50) progressed faster than PwPD with observed LDR in several motor and non-motor domains.

conclusionsThe LDR is a stable component of the levodopa response and needs to be considered in clinical trials. These findings argue against a declining LDR as a major driver of motor fluctuations in PD. © 2026 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsLevodopaParkinson DiseaseAgedCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsAntiparkinson AgentsLevodopalevodopa responselong durationParkinson's diseasePPMIprogression

Identifiers

PMID42104878
PMCPMC13518283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.