Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104870›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2026

Listening across frequencies: Capturing seizures of all patients to advance antiseizure medication development.

Stéphane Auvin, Jacqueline French

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stéphane AuvinAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Robert-Debré, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3874-9749
Jacqueline FrenchDepartment of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2242-8027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seizure frequency has been the primary endpoint in epilepsy trials, with enrollment usually requiring ≥4 seizures per month. This threshold is more and more misaligned with clinical reality, as the availability of more treatment options has reduced baseline seizure burden, with a risk of excluding a proportion of patients from trials. Although cognitive and developmental outcomes are gaining prominence, seizure control remains essential due to its impact on morbidity and mortality. We have tools to study all types of seizure frequency: Time-to-event designs, including time-to-pre-randomization seizure count or time to the Nth seizure, offer a validated alternative by enabling inclusion across a wider range of seizure frequencies while maintaining methodological rigor. Future trial designs should study cognitive outcomes, while studies focusing on anti-seizure efficacy remain critical.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsDrug DevelopmentEpilepsySeizuresHumansResearch DesignAnticonvulsantsanti‐seizure medicationepilepsyseizure counttrial design

Identifiers

PMID42104870
PMCPMC13525563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.