ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2026
Passage of Time or Delay Signal at the Level of Milliseconds: A New Approach and a Selective Difficulty in Individuals With Schizophrenia.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and hypothesisIndividuals with schizophrenia report that time can feel discontinuous. Difficulties in benefiting from the passage of time at the level of hundreds of milliseconds are associated with the sense of self. However, time continuity might require millisecond-level processing. Here we leverage sequential effects in a synchrony judgment task to test whether individuals with schizophrenia and controls benefit from increased delays in the order of tens of milliseconds. STUDY
designWe re-analyzed 3 datasets (65 individuals with schizophrenia and 67 controls). Two visual stimuli appeared simultaneously or with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA, 8-96 ms). Rather than comparing sensitivity in asynchrony detection, we contrasted performance when the SOA increased, remained identical, or decreased from the previous to the current trial. In a control masking task, 19 individuals with schizophrenia and 19 controls located a masked target. STUDY
resultsPerformance improved for all participants when the SOA increased (and the task became easier), but more so for controls than for individuals with schizophrenia. These results were replicated across datasets and were specific to trials in which SOA increased on consecutive trials. This effect persisted even when SOAs were frequently identical and when we controlled for SOA magnitude. The group difference was specific to temporal judgments and was not observed in the masking task.
conclusionsThese findings reveal a difficulty for individuals with schizophrenia to benefit from delay signals at the millisecond level, which we suggest underlies their experience of time fragmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.