ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026
Time Windows Used When Identifying Current Drug Use and Polypharmacy.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe length of the time window used to assess "current drug use" or "number of medications used" will influence the estimates hereof; however, no consensus exists on the optimal width of such time windows. We aimed to explore how the estimated prevalence of drug use in general, and of polypharmacy in particular, is affected by definitions used.
methodsWe conducted a drug-utilization study divided into two parts. In the first part, we focused on current drug use. Using population-based registries from Denmark, we identified adults (i.e., individuals aged ≥ 18) during 2020-2022, and among them, current use of different drugs, including those with typically chronic or episodic patterns of use. The second part of the study focused on polypharmacy. We estimated its prevalence, based on different definitions, using population-based registries from Denmark in a cohort of older adults (i.e., individuals aged ≥ 65) in 2022. We also evaluated the accuracy of different criteria for predicting polypharmacy using simulations.
resultsEvaluating current drug use, the proportion of individuals classified as exposed increased with the length of the time window for all drugs, reaching a plateau considering a 120-150-day window for statins, glucose-lowering drugs, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and a 180-300-day window for opioids, whereas no plateau was reached for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 360 days. The prevalence of polypharmacy ranged from 21% (10 different 4th level Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) groups in 1 year) to 92% (two different 4th level ATC groups in 1 year) depending on the applied definition. In the simulation, the best criterion for identifying polypharmacy required at least two dispensations during the one-year study period for each of at least five drugs, with sensitivity ranging between 0.93 and 1.0, and specificity between 0.72 and 1.0.
conclusionsTime windows up to 120 days are too short to identify baseline drug use in the Danish setting. How polypharmacy is defined significantly influences its estimate, suggesting a need to use multiple definitions in each study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.