Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104741›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Gender Segregation in Medicine: The Impact of Stereotypes on Speciality Perceptions and Choices.

Domenico Carbone, Joselle Dagnes, Arianna Antinori, Arianna Radin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Domenico CarboneDepartment of Law, Political, Economic and Social Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Alessandria, Italy.
Joselle DagnesDepartment of Cultures, Politics, and Society, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9024-5594
Arianna AntinoriDepartment of Law, Political, Economic and Social Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Alessandria, Italy.
Arianna RadinDepartment of Cultures, Politics, and Society, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Funding

Next Generation EU - European Union P2022XL8PW
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the role of gender stereotypes in shaping the perceptions and specialisation choices of medical students in Italy. Although women are increasingly entering the medical profession, strong gender segregation persists across medical specialities, with surgical and technological fields remaining male-dominated and people-oriented specialities female-dominated. Using a survey of 502 senior medical students, the analysis explores whether students perceive certain specialities as more suitable for men or women, and how gendered dispositions influence these perceptions and career orientations. The results show that gendered patterns in both perceptions and intended specialisation choices cannot be fully accounted for by gender alone. Rather, they are mediated by communal and agentic traits, understood as socially produced dispositions aligned with the organisation of medical work. Students with stronger communal orientations are less likely to endorse gender-stereotypical views, whereas agentic traits are associated with perceiving certain fields-both male- and female-dominated-as more suitable for one gender. Family background also plays a role, with students from medical families more likely to perceive specialities as gendered. Overall, the findings suggest that implicit biases continue to shape medical career trajectories through indirect and less visible pathways, even in contexts of increasing gender parity in education.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceSexismSpecializationStereotypingStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleHumansItalyMalePerceptionSurveys and Questionnairesgender segregationgender stereotypesItalian health systemmedical specialisationmedical students

Identifiers

PMID42104741
PMCPMC13156525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.