Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104679›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Neural Tracking of Sustained Attention, Attention Switching, and Natural Conversation in Audiovisual Environments Using Wearable EEG.

Johanna Wilroth, Oskar Keding, Martin A Skoglund, Maria Sandsten, Martin Enqvist, Emina Alickovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johanna WilrothDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Oskar KedingCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4807-5736
Martin A SkoglundDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria SandstenCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Martin EnqvistDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Emina AlickovicDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-9112

Funding

ELLIIT Research Programme, Sweden C04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday communication is dynamic and multisensory, often involving shifting attention, overlapping speech, and visual cues. Yet, most neural attention tracking studies are still limited to highly controlled lab settings, using clean, often audio-only stimuli and requiring sustained attention to a single talker. This work addresses that gap by introducing a novel dataset from 24 normal-hearing participants. We used a wearable electroencephalography (EEG) system (44 scalp electrodes and 20 cEEGrid electrodes) in an audiovisual (AV) paradigm with three conditions: sustained attention to a single talker in a two-talker environment, attention switching between two talkers, and unscripted two-talker conversations with a competing single talker. Analysis included temporal response functions (TRFs) modeling, optimal lag analysis, selective attention classification with decision windows ranging from 1.1 to 35 s, and comparisons of TRFs for attention to AV conversations versus side audio-only talkers. Key findings show significant differences in the attention-related P2 peak between attended and ignored speech across conditions for scalp EEG. Interestingly, our results revealed strong cross-condition generalization, with models trained in one condition maintaining good performance when evaluated on the other two. No significant change in performance between switching and sustained attention suggests robustness for attention switches. Optimal lag analysis revealed a narrower peak for conversation compared to single-talker AV stimuli, reflecting the additional complexity of multi-talker processing. Classification of selective attention was consistently above chance (55%-70% accuracy) for scalp EEG, whereas cEEGrid data yielded lower correlations, highlighting the need for further methodological improvements. These results demonstrate that wearable EEG can reliably track selective attention in dynamic, multisensory listening scenarios and provide guidance for designing future AV paradigms and real-world attention tracking applications.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionBrainElectroencephalographySpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationWearable Electronic DevicesYoung Adultaudiovisual stimuliauditory attention decodingconversationneural speech trackingwearable EEG

Identifiers

PMID42104679
PMCPMC13156524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.