ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Digging into dirt: Rewilding with threatened mammals shapes soil-emerging insect assemblages.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digging into dirt: Rewilding with threatened mammals shapes soil-emerging insect assemblages.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digging mammals function as ecosystem engineers by altering soil structure, influencing nutrient cycling and shaping vegetation communities. The widespread decline of these taxa globally, driven by habitat loss and introduced predators, has triggered cascading ecological effects, yet the consequences for soil-dwelling insect communities remain poorly understood. Insects, many of which have subterranean larval stages, provide essential functions such as pollination, decomposition and nutrient cycling, making them ideal indicators for evaluating the restructuring of ecological communities following mammal reintroductions. Here, we used data from a long-term experimental mammal exclusion study within a predator-free sanctuary (Scotia Wildlife Sanctuary) in south-eastern Australia to test how the reintroduction of digging mammals affects the structure and composition of insect communities emerging from soil. We sampled insects using emergence traps across replicated plots of mammal reintroduction, exclusion, and procedural control in 2010 and in 2018, 8 years after fence installation. While variation in digging activity (indexed by pit density) did not significantly affect richness or biomass of soil-emerging insect taxa, areas with digging showed reduced insect abundance. Hierarchical modelling of taxa communities revealed that parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera) and predatory robber flies (Diptera: Asilidae) were strongly associated with plots without digging activity, likely reflecting sensitivity to direct predation or nest disturbance. No herbivorous beetle taxa showed a statistically supported association with treatment, indicating that negative associations with digging activity were restricted to specific parasitoids and predatory groups, rather than representing a consistent trophic-wide response. Our findings therefore indicate that the reintroduction of ecosystem engineers alters insect assemblages, potentially cascading through to multitrophic interactions and ecosystem functioning. This is important because it (1) suggests there may have been profound effects of the widespread loss of ecosystem engineers on ecosystems across the Australian continent; and (2) highlights that whole-of-ecosystem knowledge is critical to getting rewilding right. We emphasise the importance of thorough, long-term ecological monitoring of invertebrate assemblages to inform mammal reintroduction and restoration efforts, ensuring they align with broader ecosystem management objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.