ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Simulation-Based Education to Support Nurses' Critical Thinking in Delirium Recognition: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo map how simulation-based education supports the development of critical thinking skills required for nurses to recognize delirium in clinical practice.
designA scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, refined by Levac and colleagues.
methodsTwo reviewers independently screened and extracted data to identify studies evaluating simulation-based education designed to strengthen nurses' delirium recognition and associated critical thinking processes. A narrative approach was used to chart and synthesize findings across varied simulation modalities and clinical contexts. DATA SOURCES: The search was conducted on 4 September 2025, using MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO. No timeframe was applied to the search.
resultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Simulation-based education consistently enhanced skills aligned with critical thinking, including observational accuracy, recognition of fluctuating cognitive cues, clinical reasoning, reflective awareness, empathy and communication within interprofessional teams. Structured debriefing played a central role in helping nurses analyse decision-making processes and integrate experiential learning into clinical judgement. Several studies reported changes in practice, including more consistent use of delirium identification tools and improved clarity of clinical documentation.
conclusionSimulation-based education strengthens interconnected domains of critical thinking that underpin nurses' capacity to recognize delirium early and respond effectively to its fluctuating presentation. These findings highlight the educational value of immersive, theory-informed simulation for developing the clinical judgement required in cognitively complex patient situations. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Integrating structured simulation into nursing education and professional development may enhance timely delirium recognition, foster more effective interprofessional communication and support safer, higher-quality care for hospitalized adults. IMPACT: Simulation-based education offers a practical and scalable strategy for improving delirium recognition across care settings. By supporting nurses in noticing subtle cognitive changes, interpreting clinical patterns and communicating concerns with clarity and confidence, simulation contributes to stronger workforce preparedness and patient safety. REPORTING
methodThis review adhered to PRISMA-ScR reporting guidance. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.