Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104629›Full record

ArticleEcology2026

Colonization and extinction mediate environmental effects on the phylogenetic diversity of invertebrate communities.

Nadia B Páez-Rosales, Jessica L Ware, Diane S Srivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadia B Páez-RosalesDepartment of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0854-3993
Jessica L WareDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA.
Diane S SrivastavaDepartment of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4541-5595

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSecretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogeny offers a powerful framework for understanding mechanisms driving community assembly. Yet, most empirical studies in community phylogenetics rely on observational approaches. In this study, we explore how two important drivers of community assembly-habitat size and predator presence-shape species richness and phylogenetic relatedness of prey communities by altering colonization and extinction processes. Using bromeliad invertebrate communities as our study system, we combined surveys of natural communities with experiments that manipulated habitat size and predator presence. Colonization and extinction were isolated in separate experiments to test whether effects of habitat size and predator presence differed across stages of community assembly. Following species-area theory, we expected larger habitats to increase species richness and, given the strong consumptive effects of the top predator (a damselfly larvae), we expected species richness to decline in the presence of predators. Under a community phylogenetics framework, if traits mediating responses to these factors are phylogenetically conserved, we expected the phylogenetic structure of the community (i.e., relatedness) to have deterministic patterns along both gradients. Specifically, if habitat size functions as an environmental filter, small bromeliads would host phylogenetically clustered assemblages; alternatively, if it functions as a mediator for coexistence among close relatives, larger habitats would exhibit greater relatedness. Likewise, we expected the generalist top predators to increase relatedness when closely related taxa have shared defensive traits. As traits mediating community assembly may vary in their phylogenetic distribution across lineages, we also anticipated relatedness patterns to vary across taxonomic scales. We found a positive effect of habitat size on species richness, which was driven by colonization mechanisms. Habitat size also affected relatedness, but the direction depended on the taxonomic scale, with positive relationships at broad scales and negative relationships at narrower scales. By contrast, predators reduced species richness through extinction mechanisms, although these effects were masked in natural communities by continuous replacement of individuals through colonization. Predator effects on relatedness were variable across taxonomic scales, suggesting the involvement of multiple traits at different phylogenetic depths. Together, our findings highlight the complex interplay between environmental factors and community assembly in structuring taxonomic and phylogenetic dimensions of diversity.

Indexed as

BiodiversityExtinction, BiologicalInvertebratesPhylogenyAnimalsbromeliad ecosystemcommunity phylogeneticsexperimental ecologyhabitat sizepredationtop‐down trophic interactionstropical ecology

Identifiers

PMID42104629
PMCPMC13156477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.