ArticleCancer medicine2026
Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Recurrence in High-Grade Glioma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe first year after treatment for high-grade glioma (HGG) is recognized as the peak interval for recurrence. Accurate prediction of recurrence during this period is critical for timely management and early intervention. This study aimed to develop a fusion model that integrates MRI-derived features with clinical variables.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 309 postoperative patients with HGG who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital from 2016 to 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (7:3) to training (n = 216) and test (n = 93) cohorts. Clinical variables were screened using univariate analyses. Regions of interest (ROIs)-including the postoperative cavity and peritumoral edema-were manually segmented on T2-weighted images by two senior physicians using ITK-SNAP. Pretrained DenseNet-121, DenseNet-201, and DenseNet-169 architectures were used to extract deep-learning features. These features were used to construct deep-learning models; all models were trained using fivefold cross-validation on the training cohort. Gradient-weighted class activation maps (Grad-CAM) were generated to visualize model attention. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsOf the 309 patients, 134 experienced recurrence within one year. Integrating clinical variables with transformer-based models yielded substantial performance gains. Among the integrated models, Combined-Transformer-DenseNet121 achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.903 (95% CI, 0.862-0.943) in the training cohort and 0.747 (95% CI, 0.642-0.852) in the test cohort. Calibration fidelity was improved; Hosmer-Lemeshow tests indicated excellent agreement between predicted and observed outcomes (HL statistic, 0.166 [training] vs. 0.158 [test]). DCA demonstrated superior clinical utility in both training and test cohorts, consistently yielding the highest net benefit across threshold probabilities when model-predicted probabilities were applied.
conclusionsThe proposed model demonstrated superior performance for predicting one-year recurrence in high-grade glioma compared with traditional approaches, offering high accuracy and facilitating early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.