SynthesisBMC psychology2026
Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy-based interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by social communication deficits and emotional dysregulation. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has shown potential benefits in various psychiatric conditions; however, evidence regarding its effectiveness in individuals with ASD remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of DBT-based interventions on emotional regulation, suicidal ideation, and depressive symptoms in ASD.
methodsSix English and Chinese databases were searched from inception to April 1, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DBT-based interventions with control conditions in individuals with ASD were included. Data were pooled using standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and subgroup analyses were conducted.
resultsFour RCTs involving 375 participants were included. Compared with controls, DBT-based interventions were associated with significant improvements in emotional regulation (SMD = - 0.89, 95% CI: -1.67 to - 0.10) and reductions in suicidal ideation (SMD = - 1.97, 95% CI: -3.02 to - 0.91) and depressive symptoms (SMD = - 2.23, 95% CI: -4.35 to - 0.11). Subgroup analysis indicated that shorter session duration (≤ 60 min) was associated with greater improvements in emotional regulation, whereas no significant effect was observed for longer sessions (> 60 min). No significant effects were found for anxiety.
conclusionDBT-based interventions show potential benefits in improving emotional regulation, reducing suicidal ideation, and alleviating depressive symptoms in individuals with ASD. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of trials and substantial heterogeneity. Further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.