ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2026
Scaffold-based evaluation metrics for fair comparison of molecular generators.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Scaffold‑based evaluation metrics for fair comparison of molecular generators.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular generators enable the exploration of chemical space to identify novel compounds with desirable properties. However, assessing their performance remains challenging due to the structural diversity and volume of the generated molecules. Commonly used evaluation metrics, focusing on chemical validity and novelty, do not fully align with the primary goal of molecular generation: the discovery of new biologically active compounds. To address this limitation, we introduce scaffold-based metrics that enable a fair comparison by evaluating a generator's ability to recover biologically relevant scaffolds absent from the input set. We applied the scaffold Recovery Score (RS), SEt scaffold Diversity (SED), and Absolute SEt scaffold Recall (ASER) metrics to compare several molecular generators, including Molpher, DrugEx, REINVENT, and Graph-based genetic algorithm. The proposed scaffold-based metrics provide a realistic framework for evaluating and optimizing molecular generators for their practical use in drug discovery scenarios, particularly in the design of focused virtual chemical libraries. The metrics are available as open-source in a GitHub repository at https://github.com/filvaleriia/scaffold-based-metrics .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.