Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104484›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026

Validation of the German Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) in children and adolescents with eating disorders and ADHD.

Julia Ulbrich, Anja Hilbert, Simone Munsch, Ricarda Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia UlbrichDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Philipp-Rosenthal- Strasse 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. julia.ulbrich@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2949-6675
Anja HilbertDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Philipp-Rosenthal- Strasse 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-1296
Simone MunschDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-8912
Ricarda SchmidtDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Philipp-Rosenthal- Strasse 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7794-2897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) is an internationally applied, parent-report questionnaire on children's eating behaviors, but has mainly been validated in population-based samples or children with obesity. This study presents a first comprehensive validation of the German version of the CEBQ in a treatment-seeking and community-based sample including anorexia nervosa (AN), avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), loss of control (LOC) eating, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and a healthy control group.

methodsThe German version of the CEBQ was completed by 226 parents of children and adolescents (9 months to 17 years) in Germany and Switzerland. Factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity, internal consistency, as well as sociodemographic correlates were assessed, using objectively measured anthropometrics and well-established clinical interviews and questionnaires on eating disorders and associated psychopathology in parent- and self-report.

resultsThe original 8-factor structure showed acceptable model fit and acceptable to excellent internal consistency. Convergent validity was mostly supported by weight status and interview- and questionnaire-measured eating behaviors. The CEBQ subscales differentiated between groups associated with overeating (ADHD, LOC eating) versus restrictive eating (ARFID and AN).

conclusionThe results support the German version of the CEBQ as a valid and reliable tool for assessing eating behavior in youth with eating disorders and ADHD. Future research using larger and age-specific samples should examine psychometric comparability across developmental stages and may provide norms for the CEBQ to enhance its utility as a screening tool.

Indexed as

ADHDAssessmentChild eating behavior questionnaire (CEBQ)Eating disordersFactor analysisPsychometric propertiesValidation

Identifiers

PMID42104484
PMCPMC13156854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.