SynthesisWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2026
Robotic surgery in colorectal emergencies: a systematic review of current evidence.
Synthesis in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevention, Recognition, and Management of Anastomotic Leakage and Pelvic Sepsis After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough laparoscopy continues to be the predominant minimally invasive approach in most emergency settings, the advantages of robotics, well established in elective surgery, are currently being explored in selected scenarios and specialized centres.
methodsA systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases until January 2025. Primary outcome was safety and feasibility of robotics in emergency colorectal surgery. Secondary endpoints included perioperative and postoperative outcomes.
resultsFifteen articles were included with a total of 46 robotic emergency colorectal surgical procedures. Most were performed in a tertiary centre with a da Vinci system. Most common procedures were robotic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and sigmoid colectomy for acute diverticulitis. Mean operating time for robotic right hemicolectomy was 134 min for benign cases and 241 ± 7 min for malignant cases; robotic sigmoid colectomy showed a mean operating time of 171 ± 3 min. No intraoperative complications were recorded. One case required conversion. Intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in most cases (n = 13). Mean length of stay was 5 days. No Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications, reoperation or readmission were reported. Five complete mesocolic excisions (CMEs) were performed. Pathology outcomes were available for four CMEs: showing R0 resection with a mean lymph node harvest of 54 ± 13. In four CMEs, the involved team included an on-call robotic colorectal surgeon and an experience theatre team including experienced anaesthetist in robotic procedures.
conclusionsRobotics in emergency settings is feasible and safe but requires additional training and dedicated teams for optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.