Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104414›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2026

Diagnostic accuracy of plasma cell-free DNA qPCR for Schistosoma haematobium assessed by Bayesian latent class analysis in a cohort of pregnant women from Lambaréné, Gabon.

Youssef Hamway, Theresa Josten, Sherif Abdellatif, Piyas Mukherjee, Julia Schluckebier, Sèyigbéna P Déo-Gracias Berry, Yabo Josiane Honkpèhedji, Moustapha Nzamba Maloum, Romeo Laclong Lontchi, Paul A Nguema Moure and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Youssef HamwayInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstrasse 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Theresa JostenInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstrasse 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sherif AbdellatifInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstrasse 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Piyas MukherjeeInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstrasse 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Julia SchluckebierInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstrasse 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sèyigbéna P Déo-Gracias BerryInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstrasse 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Yabo Josiane HonkpèhedjiCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon.
Moustapha Nzamba MaloumCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon.
Romeo Laclong LontchiCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon.
Paul A Nguema MoureCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon.
Brice MeulahCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon.
Pytsje T HoekstraLeiden University Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Inge KroidlGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
Govert J van DamLeiden University Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andrea KreidenweissCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon.
Meral EsenCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon.
Ayôla Akim AdégnikaCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon.
Clarissa Prazeres da CostaInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstrasse 30, 81675, Munich, Germany. clarissa.dacosta@tum.de.

Funding

Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung TTU 03.818DFG CO 1469/14-1European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership RIA2016MC-1626-FREEBILY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium is critical for disease management. However, current tools often lack sensitivity for low-intensity infections, a challenge noted in the recent WHO Roadmap for Neglected Tropical Diseases. This study aimed to evaluate a novel cell-free DNA (cfDNA) quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) assay, utilizing 20 µl of plasma with crude DNA extraction. This approach intends to improve diagnostic accuracy and lower implementation barriers for molecular tests in field settings. We compared its performance against urine filtration microscopy and the Up-converting Reporter Particle Lateral Flow Circulating Anodic Antigen (UCP-LF CAA) test in pregnant women from Lambaréné, Gabon.

methodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 296 pregnant women in Gabon. EDTA blood, urine, and stool samples were collected from December 2018 to November 2020. Urine samples were analyzed by urine filtration microscopy and UCP-LF CAA. The cfDNA qPCR assay was performed retrospectively on 20 µl of frozen plasma using a simplified DNA extraction method. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed via sensitivity, specificity, and agreement measures. Bayesian latent class analysis (BLCA) was used to estimate test performance in the absence of a gold standard.

resultsDiagnostic positivity varied: 24.3% by cfDNA qPCR, 18.6% by urine filtration microscopy, and 20.9% by UCP-LF CAA. Agreement between tests was limited. BLCA indicated qPCR to be the most sensitive (74.0%, 95% CrI: 57.2-90.8), followed by UCP-LF CAA (65.7%, 95% CrI: 49.0-82.8). Microscopy was the most specific (94.9%, 95% CrI : 89.6-99.3). Estimated prevalence ranged between 22.5 and 27.1%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed good individual performance (AUC 0.837-0.868), with performance improving when combining any two tests (AUC up to 0.931).

conclusionsThis study validates the high sensitivity of a novel cfDNA qPCR approach using only 20 µl of plasma, demonstrating performance comparable to microscopy and UCP-LF CAA. While microscopy maintains high specificity, combining it with a high-sensitivity test such as qPCR or UCP-LF CAA provides significant diagnostic improvement. Further optimizing the specificity of this streamlined qPCR assay brings us closer to a highly accurate, feasible point-of-care diagnostic crucial for schistosomiasis control programs in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, HelminthReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSchistosoma haematobiumSchistosomiasis haematobiaAdultAnimalsBayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGabonHumansLatent Class AnalysisPregnancyProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, HelminthBayesian latent class analysisDiagnostic accuracyMolecular diagnosticsSchistosomiasis

Identifiers

PMID42104414
PMCPMC13156850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.