Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104407›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026

Modification of the coronal plane alignment of the knee classification considering the joint line convergence angle in high tibial osteotomy: a geometric approach.

Ju-Ho Song, Bum-Sik Lee, Jong-Min Kim, Seong-Il Bin, Jaejung Ryu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ju-Ho SongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Bum-Sik LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. benton2@naver.com.
Jong-Min KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Il BinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Jaejung RyuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive joint line obliquity (JLO) is associated with poor outcomes in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification categorizes knee phenotypes by alignment and JLO but overlooks the joint line convergence angle (JLCA), which impacts JLO pre- and postoperatively in OWHTO. This study aims to modify JLO calculation by incorporating JLCA through a geometric approach, with the goal of better reflecting the knee joint orientation under weight-bearing conditions.

methods323 knees that received OWHTO were retrospectively reviewed. The study included OWHTO patients who had pre- and 1-year postoperative long-standing hip-to-ankle radiographs for CPAK classification and JLCA measurement. JLOs were calculated using two methods based on a geometric approach: conventional JLO (cJLO), defined as (lateral distal femoral angle [LDFA] + medial proximal tibial angle [MPTA])/2-90°, and modified JLO (mJLO), which incorporates the JLCA, defined as (LDFA + MPTA)/2 + JLCA/2° - 90°. These were compared to the knee joint orientation using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score.

resultsMechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA) was corrected from - 7.1 ± 2.7° preoperatively to 2.1 ± 2.3° at 1 year postoperatively, and JLCA decreased from 3.1 ± 1.9° to 2.4 ± 1.7°. The HSS scores showed significant improvement, rising from 68.6 ± 11.7 preoperatively to 91.3 ± 7.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The knee joint orientation was measured at - 1.0 ± 1.9° preoperatively and 1.9 ± 2.3° postoperatively at 1 year. Comparatively, cJLO values were - 3.3 ± 1.5° and 0.9 ± 2.0°, while mJLO values were - 1.8 ± 1.8° and 2.1 ± 2.3°. ICCs showed preoperative and 1-year postoperative cJLO at 0.842 (95% CI, 0.804-0.873) and 0.927 (95% CI, 0.909-0.941), respectively, while mJLO demonstrated 0.881 (95% CI, 0.851-0.904) and 0.949 (95% CI, 0.936-0.959). Bland-Altman plots showed that both preoperative and 1-year postoperative mJLO had smaller differences from the knee joint orientation than cJLO, indicating that mJLO more closely reflects functional joint orientation.

conclusionThe mJLO, derived through a geometric approach that incorporates JLCA, was found to more closely reflect the knee joint orientation compared to the cJLO described in the CPAK classification. To effectively apply the CPAK classification in OWHTO, it is essential to account for JLCAs before and after surgery. Accordingly, mJLO can be represented as (LDFA + MPTA)/2 + JLCA/2° - 90°.

Indexed as

Knee JointOsteotomyTibiaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCPAK classificationHigh tibial osteotomyJoint line convergence angleJoint line obliquity

Identifiers

PMID42104407
PMCPMC13360476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.