SynthesisParasites & vectors2026
The ecoepidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected tropical skin disease. In Ethiopia, CL is a public health concern; about 29 million people are at risk, with an estimated incidence of up to 50,000 new cases annually. In endemic communities, access to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention is crucial but often limited. Understanding the prevalence and access to care, as well as exploring its relationship to agroecological factors, is crucial to inform control strategies.
objectivesThe aim of this work is to estimate the pooled prevalence, access to care service facilities, and spatial distribution and relationship to agroecological factors.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) framework. The metafor and metadata packages from R Studio were used to obtain pooled prevalence and odds ratio using a random-effects model with a double arcsine transformation. The CL endemicity at the woreda level was overlaid with the locations of CL treatment centers and agroecological zones using ArcGIS.
resultsThe pooled prevalence of CL was 6.75% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.37-11.17). Sociodemographic factors (male gender, rural living) and environmental factors (muddy walls, outdoor sleeping, proximity to rocky habitats, and hyrax populations) were significantly associated with CL. CL cases were reported from 85 woredas with a broad spatial distribution; a higher proportion of them were from the Weyna Dega, Dega, and Upper Kola agroecological zones. Access to care is generally poor, with service centers for CL often centralized at the zone level.
conclusionsThe estimated pooled prevalence likely underrepresents the true burden of CL. The identified risk factors are more related to rural livelihoods and living conditions, and most of the endemic woredas are in the most productive agrarian agroecological zones, which underlines the health and socioeconomic significance of CL in Ethiopia. Thus, decentralizing healthcare services and improving surveillance for CL are crucial steps in breaking the vicious cycle of poverty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.