ArticleBMC public health2026
Understanding Substance Use in Alaska Native Youth- A Social Network Perspective.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlaska Native (AN) youth and their communities experience many health inequities, including increased rates of substance use. AN youth have earlier initiation and heavier use of substances compared to other youth, with over half of AN youth having engaged in use by 13. While prior research has examined risk factors, few studies have evaluated how social network structures may protect against substance use in youth. This study used social network analysis to examine associations between peer ties, connections with school staff, cultural connectedness, victimization, and substance use among AN youth.
methodsThis cross-sectional study collected social network data from 7th -12th grade students (n = 109) at an urban school in Alaska using Network Canvas, a tablet-based platform. Students nominated peers, school staff, family, and non-family, non-school individuals to whom they are close. They then completed survey items assessing cultural connectedness, substance use, depression, victimization, and suicidal ideation. Multivariate logistic regression models examined associations between demographic, psychosocial, and network characteristics and alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use in AN youth.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 14.7 years, with youth nominating an average of 15.4 network members. Victimization was consistently associated with greater odds of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use. For alcohol use, contact frequency with staff was protective at higher levels, demonstrated by a negative quadratic effect, while greater emotional closeness to those in one's network had a positive linear effect. Similar patterns were observed for marijuana use, including a significant negative quadratic effect of contact frequency and a positive linear effect of closeness. Neither contact frequency nor closeness was significantly associated with tobacco use. Greater cultural connectedness was associated with greater odds of tobacco use but was not significantly associated with alcohol or marijuana use.
conclusionSubstance use among urban AN youth is influenced by complex social processes involving victimization, peer relationships, and connections with school staff. Frequent contact with school staff appears to play a protective role against alcohol and marijuana use. This study demonstrates how network data can identify both risk and protective factors embedded in youths' social environments and insights can be directly applied to the development of prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.