Trial reportBMC oral health2026
A novel plate design versus two conventional miniplates for treatment of mandibular angle fractures (a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial).
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07103590 (New Design Sagittal Split Plate Versus Two Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
New Design Sagittal Split Plate Versus Two Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmong facial skeletal injuries, mandibular fractures are highly prevalent, second after nasal bone fractures. Consequently, a lot of research has focused on treatment modalities for these fractures, to ensure faster healing & rigid fixation. One of these modalities is the application of the Sagittal Split plate at the mandibular angle. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of a novel Sagittal Split Osteotomy Plate (SSOP) design versus conventional two-miniplate fixation in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures, and to assess the biomechanical stability of the new design. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this pilot randomized controlled trial, 16 patients with mandibular angle fractures were randomly assigned (1:1 allocation ratio) using computer-generated block randomization into two groups. Group A (8) patients were treated using the new plate modified from Sagittal Split plate, and Group B (8) patients were treated using two conventional miniplates. Mechanical test bench was performed to measure plate strength & mechanical stability of the new plate design. Clinical evaluations were performed at 24 h, one, four, six and twelve weeks postoperative to assess operating time, pain, occlusion, wound healing & interincisal mouth opening. In addition, radiographic assessments were conducted immediately postoperatively and at three months to evaluate the mean bone density at the fracture site.
resultThe study group showed reduced operating time. No statistically significant differences between the groups regarding occlusion, wound healing, postoperative pain and interincisal mouth opening. A statistically significant difference was observed regarding mean bone density of the study group after 3 months. The mean displacement of the mechanical test was 1.46 mm under 60 N of the new plate.
conclusionWithin the limitations of this pilot study, the novel SSOP demonstrated reduced operative time and comparable short-term clinical outcomes to conventional double-miniplate fixation. Radiographically, higher bone density was observed at three months, and the prototype demonstrated acceptable baseline biomechanical outcomes during pre-clinical testing. While the SSOP represents a potential fixation alternative, larger longitudinal studies remain necessary to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and to directly compare this prototype biomechanically against other established plates used for mandibular angle fractures.
trial registrationThis clinical trial was prospectively submitted for registration to ClinicalTrials.gov prior to the enrollment of the first participant (identifier NCT07103590; official public posting August 5, 2025).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.