ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Neonatal conjunctivitis due to uncommon pathogen Streptococcus mitis/oralis: a case report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal conjunctivitis (NC), historically attributed to Neisseria gonorrhoeae, is now known to be caused by various pathogens, including Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Chlamydia trachomatis. Although viridans group streptococci are generally regarded as commensal organisms, they may cause opportunistic conjunctival infections. Here, we present a case of NC caused by Streptococcus mitis/oralis, a member of the Mitis group of viridans group streptococci. A 15-day-old female neonate presented with bilateral severe eyelid edema and moderate hemopurulent discharge that precluded anterior segment evaluation. Symptoms began at nine days of age with serous discharge, which gradually worsened. The severe presentation initially raised concern for orbital cellulitis. Upon hospital admission, a conjunctival swab was obtained, and treatment was initiated with topical moxifloxacin and fusidic acid, along with empirical intravenous penicillin and gentamicin. Eyelid edema and discharge improved significantly within 24-48 h. Culture results confirmed Streptococcus mitis/oralis, which was sensitive to the administered antibiotics. Complete clinical recovery was subsequently achieved without complications. This case highlights the diagnostic challenge of differentiating severe NC from orbital cellulitis and underscores the potential of S. mitis/oralis to cause significant ocular morbidity in neonates. The prompt and dramatic response to antibacterial treatment prevented long-term complications, and this case supports the hypothesis of postnatal transmission from the neonate's own nasopharyngeal flora or that of the caregiver rather than exclusive acquisition from the birth canal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.