ArticleBMC primary care2026
From knowledge to action: a blended training to enhance shared decision making skills in primary care physicians - a pilot study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundShared decision making (SDM) is a process to actively involve both patients and clinicians to weigh the benefits and risks of a healthcare decision, based on clinical guidelines and the patients' preferences, needs and values. Despite the ethical foundation of SDM, its implementation remains limited. Possible physician-reported barriers for this limited uptake include insufficient level of SDM training. Training physicians in SDM could be a part of the puzzle. A recent systematic review showed that there is a shift towards blended training more than live or online learning. We therefore developed and pilot-tested a blended training program for general practitioners (GPs) in SDM in Belgium. Acquired skills were evaluated by three viewpoint - observer, patient and physician.
methodsIn a pre-post study, GPs participated in the blended training program consisting of an e-learning and a face-to-face session with simulation patients (SPs) GPs and SPs completed surveys before (T0) and after (T1) the blended training. Consultations were recorded for analysis by observer reported scales (OPTION12 and 4SDM scale). Secondary outcomes were SDM-Q9-patient, satisfaction with consultation, knowledge and intentions towards SDM.
findingsTen GPs were included. There was a significant increase in both OPTION12 (mean (SD) from 19·37 before to 37·70 after training, p = 0·0010, 95% CI [9·65 - 27·02]) and 4SDM scale (mean (SD) from 9·2 (4·66) before to 17·00 (5·08) after training, p = 0·0001, 95% CI [5·47 - 10·13]) with a moderate-large effect after training (Cohen's D = 2·39, 95% CI [1·13 - 3·63].
interpretationThe SDM blended training for GPs improved their skills, knowledge and intentions in SDM in simulated consultations on the short term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.