Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Nomogram-based prediction of postoperative kinesiophobia in patients with coronary heart disease.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify the factors influencing postoperative kinesiophobia in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and to develop a risk nomogram model to assist in preliminary clinical risk assessment.
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted among 225 patients with CHD who underwent surgical interventions (such as coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or intracoronary stenting) at a tertiary general hospital in Anhui Province between January and December 2025. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling method. The Chinese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-Heart (TSK-SV Heart) was employed to evaluate the levels of kinesiophobia. Patients were categorized into two groups: the kinesiophobia group (≥ 37 points) and the non-kinesiophobia group (< 37 points). LASSO regression was utilized for variable selection, while multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors influencing kinesiophobia and to construct a nomogram. The model's discrimination, accuracy, and potential clinical utility were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Internal validation was performed through 10-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations).
resultsOf the 225 patients included, 136 individuals (60.44%) exhibited postoperative kinesiophobia. Multivariate logistic regression identified hypertension (OR = 3.336), cerebrovascular disease (OR = 5.695), and pain score (OR = 2.350) as independent risk factors. Conversely, higher scores on the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (OR = 0.897) and the Family Care Index (APGAR) (OR = 0.792) were independent protective factors. The model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.798 (95% CI: 0.740-0.855), with a calibration curve indicating strong concordance between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes (P = 0.477). Internal validation yielded a mean cross-validated AUC of 0.785 and a bootstrap-validated C-statistic of 0.781. DCA showed that the model offered a net benefit within a threshold probability range of 0.22 to 0.94.
conclusionPostoperative kinesiophobia is prevalent among patients with CHD. The developed nomogram exhibited robust internal predictive performance and potential clinical utility. In the absence of external validation, this model should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating, serving as a scientific basis to assist healthcare professionals in the early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating targeted interventions to enhance pain management, hope and family support. However, further multicenter studies are required for external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.