ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Compliance to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors for treatment of retinal diseases in Nigerians: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about compliance with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for the treatment of macular and retinovascular diseases among Nigerians and Africans. The objective of this study is to measure compliance to 3 or more and 6 or more intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for common macular and retinovascular diseases in Nigerian clinics and evaluate the impact on visual outcomes.
methodRetrospective multicenter chart review of 622 eyes/ 528 patients diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusions (RVOs), including branch, central, and hemiretinal (BRVO, CRVO, and HRVO), and non-AMD Choroidal Neovascular Membrane (CNVM) from five clinics (urban, semi-urban, and rural), collecting demographics, diagnosis, injection type/number, pre-/post-BCVA (converted to LogMAR), and follow-up. Treatments were intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin), Ranibizumab (Patizra), and Aflibercept (Eylea). Definitions of compliance: compliant; ≥3 injections (standard loading), also ≥ 6 injections.
resultsFor all 622 eyes, presenting BCVA: 1.21 ± 0.84 and the final BCVA: 0.91 ± 0.80 (P = < 0.001). Overall compliance with ≥ 3 injections was 47.5%, and with ≥ 6 injections, 10.1%. Compliance to ≥ 3 injections by diagnosis was as follows: AMD 50.4%, Non-AMD CNVM 58.2%, BRVO 44.8%, CRVO 44.0%, HRVO 46.7%, DME 40.6%. Age (P = 0.264) and sex (P = 0.870) did not affect compliance to ≥ 3 injections. Clinic location significantly influenced compliance with ≥ 3 injections (P = 0.000), but not with 6 injections (P = 0.173). The highest rates of compliance with ≥ 3 injections were observed in urban tertiary centers. Injection type and cost were not significant factors (P = 0.36). Eyes with ≥ 3 injections achieved better vision (≥ 6/18) across all diagnoses; the most notable improvements were in non-AMD CNVM (+ 41.4%) and BRVO (+ 35%). Statistically significant LogMAR improvements were seen in CRVO (p = 0.049) and DME (p = 0.043). Postoperative endophthalmitis occurred in 2/622 eyes (0.0032) (both Avastin); no other serious adverse event was recorded.
conclusionsReal-world compliance is significantly lower than ideal. Urban and tertiary clinics show better adherence. Receiving the recommended loading doses is associated with improved visual outcomes for most diagnoses. Understanding the reasons for non-compliance, using a prospective approach, and addressing them will improve treatment outcomes for more Nigerian and presumably African patients receiving anti-VEGF drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.