ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Does quantity equal quality? Source of protein influences American dog owner purchasing decisions more than the quantity of protein in the absence of marketing claims.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein is the most expensive macronutrient worldwide, yet protein-related claims like "high protein" or "protein #1 ingredient" strongly influence dog food purchases. Little is known about how dog owners define protein quality (PQ) and how this knowledge shapes purchasing decisions. This study investigated how perceptions of dietary protein translate from personal to dog feeding habits, the level of PQ knowledge among dog owners, and whether protein source or amount has a greater influence on dog food choice. A 60-question survey was distributed to dog owners across the United States using Qualtrics (Utah, USA) (n = 691). Each respondent answered 12 choice experiment questions in which dog food options varied by protein amount (20%, 35%), protein source (peas, chicken, chicken meal), and price ($80, $95, $110). Descriptive statistics were analyzed in SPSS Statistics (Version 29, IBM Corp.), and a multinomial logit model in STATA (Version BE) was used for choice experiment analysis, with significance set at P < 0.05. Chicken had the greatest influence on purchasing choice, followed by chicken meal, and 35% protein, compared to a baseline diet of 20% protein and peas (P < 0.001). The majority (30%) of respondents believed PQ was parallel to quantity, while only 18% could correctly define PQ as the ability of an ingredient to meet the indispensable amino acid requirements of an individual. For respondents who correctly defined PQ, all protein sources positively influenced choice, while greater protein quantity negatively influenced choice (P < 0.001). Ultimately, protein source, not amount, drives purchasing behavior in the absence of protein-related claims on dog food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.