ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Registered Clinical Trials of Ayahuasca and DMT: A Scoping Review.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in ayahuasca and its main component, N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT), has currently moved from historical and experimental use into modern clinical development. Yet, current evidence is fragmented, and systematic mapping of trial methods and design choices remains limited. We therefore systematically examined registered interventional trials of DMT, ayahuasca, and DMT combined with harmine on ClinicalTrials.gov, identifying 26 eligible trial registers for review. We extracted and harmonized trial characteristics, participant eligibility and enrollment patterns, design features, administration routes, and registered outcomes, and linked completed registrations to associated publications. The registry landscape expanded after 2020-2021 and was dominated by early-stage development, with most trials in phase I and more than half listed as completed at the time of extraction. Trials were primarily DMT-only and most often sponsored by academic or hospital institutions. Eligibility criteria were conservative, emphasizing medically and psychiatrically healthy adult cohorts and extensive cardiovascular and psychiatric exclusions. Accordingly, primary outcomes prioritized acute safety and physiological monitoring, alongside structured characterization of the subjective and altered-states profile, while disorder-specific symptom endpoints were less commonly prioritized as primary objectives. Publications linked to included trials largely reflect this early-stage focus, describing controlled administration, tolerability limits, route and formulation refinement, and initial mechanistic readouts. A smaller set of publications from depression-focused trials provides preliminary evidence of potential clinical effects, supporting further controlled replication and broader disorder-focused development. Overall, registered trials indicate an active and maturing field that has generated foundational safety and regimen knowledge, but remains constrained by a limited number of indication-specific programs beyond depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.