Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104177›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

dynConfiR: An R package for sequential sampling models of decision confidence.

Sebastian Hellmann, Michael Zehetleitner, Manuel Rausch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sebastian HellmannChair of Behavioral Research Methods, TUM School of Management, Munich, Germany. sebastian.hellmann@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3621-6343
Michael ZehetleitnerPhilosophical-pedagogical Faculty, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3363-2680
Manuel RauschPhilosophical-pedagogical Faculty, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-5544

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modeling of response times using sequential sampling models has a long history. Because choices, confidence judgments, and reaction times are closely linked in perceptual decisions, it seems only natural to simultaneously model these three outcome variables of a decision. In the package dynConfiR, we implemented various sequential sampling models of choice, response time, and decision confidence in R. This paper gives an overview of the package, which provides probability density functions as well as high-level functions for fitting parameters to empirical data, prediction of reaction time and response distributions, and simulation of artificial data sets. We describe the mathematical specifications of the implemented models and provide detailed descriptions of the implemented likelihood functions. In addition, we outline the workflow for applying the model to empirical data step-by-step: data preprocessing, model fitting, model prediction, quantitative model comparison, and visual assessment of model predictions. Finally, we present results from parameter and model recovery analyses and assess the precision of probability density calculations, illustrating the robustness of the implemented computations. Offering intuitive usability and high flexibility, the package is targeted at researchers in the fields of decision-making and confidence and does not require expert-level programming skills.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSoftwareComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsReaction TimeCognitive modelingConfidenceDecision-makingDrift-diffusion modelsR packageSequential sampling models

Identifiers

PMID42104177
PMCPMC13156207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.