ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
Vitamin D in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: still a challenge.
Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo critically evaluate the current evidence on the role of vitamin D in inflammatory rheumatic diseases, including its association with disease activity, potential immunomodulatory effects, and the clinical impact of supplementation.
methodsA narrative review was conducted based on a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Epistemonikos databases up to October 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses evaluating vitamin D status and/or supplementation in adult patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Evidence was synthesized qualitatively, prioritizing study design and level of evidence.
resultsVitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent across inflammatory rheumatic diseases and is associated with higher disease activity, fatigue, and poorer musculoskeletal outcomes. Experimental data support immunomodulatory effects; however, clinical evidence remains heterogeneous. Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that supplementation effectively corrects deficiency and is safe, with modest improvements in disease activity and fatigue mainly in patients with low baseline 25(OH)D levels. In contrast, large trials and Mendelian randomization studies do not support a causal role of vitamin D in disease onset or sustained remission. Meta-analyses show small and inconsistent benefits, limited by heterogeneity in study design, dosing regimens, and populations.
conclusionVitamin D deficiency is a common and clinically relevant finding in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. While supplementation reliably restores adequate levels and may provide modest clinical benefits in deficient patients, current evidence does not support a causal or disease-modifying role. Maintaining serum 25(OH)D ≥30 ng/mL remains advisable for skeletal health, whereas its immunological benefits require further investigation through well-designed randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42104141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.