ArticleMycorrhiza2026
Indigenous inoculant dampens the impact of remediation of heavy metal polluted soil on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An interpretable soil-pH suitability index for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal genera.Mycorrhiza · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The finite resource of fertile soil can take thousands of years to develop. Non-degradable toxic metals (heavy metals), pose a significant health risk due to their persistence in the environment. Soil washing with EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) has been shown to remove toxic metals (Pb, Zn, Cd), but this process can also have a significant impact on soil microbial diversity. In this study, we investigated, using molecular methods (18S rRNA amplicon sequencing), the development of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities in the roots of Lolium perenne after a soil remediation treatment with EDTA. Plants were grown on two soil types (calcareous and acidic), in remediated and control (unremediated, polluted) soils, and with or without the addition of a local environmental inoculant (grassland soil and roots). The addition of the inoculant increased the richness and evenness of AM fungi, and reduced the compositional dissimilarity of communities between remediated and unremediated soils. Disturbance from the remediation process and inoculation, lead to a shift in the identity of dominant taxa reflecting different traits among the AM fungi. This suggested two main mechanisms behind community development in remediated soils, i.e. priority effects and competitive exclusion among dominant taxa. These findings emphasise the importance of nature-based solutions (indigenous environmental inoculants) and AM fungi for sustainable soil management practices. This is particularly important for restoring soil biodiversity in sites that have been exposed to multiple disturbances, which may include contaminated sites and soil remediation, as well as conventional agricultural systems, and urban soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.