Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104122›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Effectiveness and safety of proton therapy in intracranial meningioma treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jeremiah Hillkiah Wijaya, Abdelrahman Ramadan Elashry, Sarmad Javaid, Mohga Yasser, Bismon Jibu, Bharath Narayanan, Daniela A Perez-Chadid, Aafreen Azmi, Juan Pablo Avila-Madrigal, Elizabeth E Ginalis and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Obstacles and Trials in Treating Primary Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jeremiah Hillkiah WijayaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. jwij0023@student.monash.edu.
Abdelrahman Ramadan ElashryCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Sarmad JavaidSharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mohga YasserCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Bismon JibuFar Eastern Medical College, Khabarovsk, Russia.
Bharath NarayananFar Eastern Medical College, Khabarovsk, Russia.
Daniela A Perez-ChadidDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Aafreen AzmiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Juan Pablo Avila-MadrigalAnatomy Department, Universidad de los Andes School of Medicine, Bogota, Colombia.
Elizabeth E GinalisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Anil NandaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors, often treated surgically. However, complete resection is frequently limited by proximity to critical structures, necessitating adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy. Proton therapy offers dosimetric advantages over photon-based radiotherapy, particularly in sparing adjacent normal tissues. This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of proton therapy for intracranial meningiomas across tumor grades and clinical scenarios. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane from inception to November 10, 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported clinical outcomes of proton therapy in ≥ 10 adult meningioma patients. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled complication rates and survival outcomes were calculated using random-effects models. Nineteen studies involving 1,431 patients were included. WHO Grade I tumors comprised 70.6% of cases; Grades II/III made up 25.2% and 4.2%, respectively. The most common proton dose regimens ranged from 13 to 70.2 Gy (RBE). The pooled complication rate was 16% (95% CI 5-27; p < 0.001; I² = 98.5%). Nine studies reported a statistically significant 5-year overall-survival proportion of 91% (95% CI 88-94; p < 0.001; I² = 49.3%). Radiologic local control averaged 71% (95% CI 50-86; I² = 88.2%). Proton therapy provides effective tumor control with acceptable toxicity, especially for low-grade or anatomically complex meningiomas. It is a valuable option for select patients, though further prospective studies are needed to optimize dosing and assess long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaProton TherapyHumansTreatment OutcomeIntracranial meningiomaProton therapyRadiotherapyStereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID42104122
PMCPMC13156113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.