SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Effectiveness and safety of proton therapy in intracranial meningioma treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obstacles and Trials in Treating Primary Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors, often treated surgically. However, complete resection is frequently limited by proximity to critical structures, necessitating adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy. Proton therapy offers dosimetric advantages over photon-based radiotherapy, particularly in sparing adjacent normal tissues. This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of proton therapy for intracranial meningiomas across tumor grades and clinical scenarios. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane from inception to November 10, 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported clinical outcomes of proton therapy in ≥ 10 adult meningioma patients. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled complication rates and survival outcomes were calculated using random-effects models. Nineteen studies involving 1,431 patients were included. WHO Grade I tumors comprised 70.6% of cases; Grades II/III made up 25.2% and 4.2%, respectively. The most common proton dose regimens ranged from 13 to 70.2 Gy (RBE). The pooled complication rate was 16% (95% CI 5-27; p < 0.001; I² = 98.5%). Nine studies reported a statistically significant 5-year overall-survival proportion of 91% (95% CI 88-94; p < 0.001; I² = 49.3%). Radiologic local control averaged 71% (95% CI 50-86; I² = 88.2%). Proton therapy provides effective tumor control with acceptable toxicity, especially for low-grade or anatomically complex meningiomas. It is a valuable option for select patients, though further prospective studies are needed to optimize dosing and assess long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.