ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Does the benefit of time for working memory arise at encoding or retrieval?
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extended free time between the encoding of list items enhances immediate memory for serial order. Previous research suggests that this effect is predominantly proactive, free time improves memory for items presented after an extended interval but not for those presented before. This conclusion is based on two key findings. First, in forward serial recall, the benefit of free time increases with the serial position of the items (Mızrak & Oberauer, 2021, Oberauer, 2022b). Second, when a single inter-item interval is lengthened, the additional time primarily benefits items presented after that interval (Lu et al., 2024; Mızrak & Oberauer, 2021). Here we tested these two findings using both forward and random order recall and examined whether the relationship between free-time duration and the serial position of item differs when test order was changed. Our findings replicate the evidence for a proactive benefit of time in most conditions. Additional retroactive benefits of free time were apparent in some conditions. Retroactive benefits were more often observed when test order was random, in particular when participants could anticipate being tested in random order.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.