Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42104097›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Does the benefit of time for working memory arise at encoding or retrieval?

Eda Mızrak, Klaus Oberauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eda MızrakDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland, Binzmuhlestr. 14, 8050. e.mizrak@qmul.ac.uk.
Klaus OberauerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland, Binzmuhlestr. 14, 8050.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended free time between the encoding of list items enhances immediate memory for serial order. Previous research suggests that this effect is predominantly proactive, free time improves memory for items presented after an extended interval but not for those presented before. This conclusion is based on two key findings. First, in forward serial recall, the benefit of free time increases with the serial position of the items (Mızrak & Oberauer, 2021, Oberauer, 2022b). Second, when a single inter-item interval is lengthened, the additional time primarily benefits items presented after that interval (Lu et al., 2024; Mızrak & Oberauer, 2021). Here we tested these two findings using both forward and random order recall and examined whether the relationship between free-time duration and the serial position of item differs when test order was changed. Our findings replicate the evidence for a proactive benefit of time in most conditions. Additional retroactive benefits of free time were apparent in some conditions. Retroactive benefits were more often observed when test order was random, in particular when participants could anticipate being tested in random order.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermMental RecallSerial LearningTime FactorsAdolescentAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleYoung AdultForward serial recallFree time benefitRandom probed recallWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID42104097
PMCPMC13156199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.