ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Cobotic drilling assistant for orthopedic surgery using Gaussian process-based breakthrough detection.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe introduce a cobot assisted cortical bone drilling, as applied in femoral, or clavicular fractures. This requires high accuracy, as minor deviations can cause complications through soft tissue penetration (STP). Human-robot collaboration (HRC) combines the surgeon's expertise with robotic stability and sensing accuracy. Thereby, the robot assistant passively guides the drill and prevents soft tissue penetration by detecting breakthroughs via integrated f/t and joint velocity sensors and stopping in place.
methodsA robotic arm that passively guides the surgeon during drilling and actively stops upon breakthrough. The detection algorithm is online and model-free, instead relying on online Gaussian process (GP) regression to adapt to varying drilling conditions. The system was evaluated in a user study with an experimental group of N=16 and a control group of N=17 participants, whereby STP was measured using a depth camera.
resultsFemoral, ulnar, and generic bone samples were drilled with initially sharp 3.2 mm drill bits. Across all bone types, the experimental group outperformed the control group by 6.79 mm (p< 0.001) and undercut the reported STP for experienced surgeons, 5.1 mm by 2.54 mm (p< 0.02) for the generic bone case, despite the fact that only lay participants were tested in this study. Baseline algorithms such as thresholding were also outperformed by the proposed method.
conclusionThese findings provide evidence toward the potential of HRC and model online breakthrough detection methods to increase safety in orthopedic drilling and represent a promising step toward future clinical implementation and surgical training applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42104087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.