ArticleScientific reports2026
Consistency analysis of AI cell recognition results between non anticoagulant and anticoagulant marrow smear after Wright's staining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence with bone marrow cytology represents a significant trend in the application of AI image recognition technology within the medical sector. Despite the current high accuracy of AI in cell identification, there remains a clinical need for fully automated AI cell recognition equipment that spans from sample processing to result generation. The source of the sample's origin as an influencing factor on the final results is a crucial consideration in equipment design. In this research, patient bone marrow fluid samples were processed into various types of anticoagulated bone marrow smears-EDTAK anticoagulated, sodium citrate anticoagulated, heparin lithium anticoagulated, and sodium citrate anticoagulated-and non-anticoagulated, and subsequently analyzed by AI devices. The findings revealed a significant lack of consistency in cell classification ratios and the total number of cells recognized between anticoagulated and non-anticoagulated bone marrow smear samples. This aspect must be taken into account when designing a fully automated AI-based bone marrow cell recognition device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.