ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
A screening strategy for vinyl acetate materials for solid-phase microextraction based on dynamic vapor sorption.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Green Analytical Workflows: Recent Advances in Sample Preparation and Instrumental Analysis of Food Contact Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In solid-phase microextraction (SPME) research, selecting a coating adsorbent with good compatibility for target molecules can be difficult, and there is no specific migration testing method for vinyl acetate monomer, which is commonly used in the production of food contact materials (FCMs). First, 13 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with different structural characteristics and surface chemical environments were prepared and divided into three groups (good, medium, and poor) based on the dynamic vapor sorption (DVS) method. The distinction of superiority and inferiority determined by the DVS method was completely consistent with that determined by the extraction effect of the SPME probe, and the data from the two variables exhibited a statistically significant positive correlation. Then, the electrostatic potential (ESP) distribution on the typical material surface and target molecule and the charge density difference (CDD) of their interaction during adsorption were obtained using a computational simulation method. The results showed that ZIF-68 and ZIF-70 had the highest adsorption energy, which was consistent with the adsorption performance. Finally, ZIF-68 was selected as the optimal adsorption material, and the extraction conditions were optimized. The optimized method was successfully applied to test the specific migration amounts of several ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.