ArticleNpj mental health research2026
Personalized modeling of stress and blood pressure reactivity using mobile health data.
Article in Npj mental health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychological stress is a key driver of short-term blood pressure (BP) elevations and cardiovascular risk, yet its moment-to-moment impact in daily life remains difficult to predict. In this longitudinal observational study, we collected multimodal data from 20 adults with self-reported hypertension, including continuous wearable-derived heart rate and activity, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) stress ratings, and ambulatory BP measurements in free-living conditions. The dataset comprised 3694 EMA responses and 3812 BP measurements collected over approximately four weeks per participant (mean 24.1 ± 8.5 days). We evaluated whether participant-specific ("personalized") models outperform a single pooled population model. Two prediction tasks were examined: (i) prediction of near-term BP elevations from wearable signals and stress EMA responses and (ii) prediction of self-reported stress from wearable signals and BP. Across both tasks, personalized models consistently improved predictive performance. For BP prediction, personalized models achieved a mean validation AUROC of 0.803, exceeding the population model by 0.235, while for stress prediction they achieved a mean validation AUROC of 0.849, exceeding the population model by 0.208. These findings suggest that personalized wearable-based models can capture individual patterns of stress and BP dynamics, with direct implications for precision mental health assessment and just-in-time adaptive intervention design in future work.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.